If a lecturer wants to bring respect to a course, does it mean he or she should give out
no A's and give only 6A-'s? I leave it to you to just imagine the number of F's that came out. Such a lecturer, to me, is beyond what negative words could describe. Over 100 students out of the 292 students who took Nutrition 201 failed. First, her doors are not opened to students to channel any problem they face with the course. For a whole she only allow 1hour which is not enough. One thing I like about her is that, she is very friendly in class and i think that is what I will miss about her. She is a doctor in nutrition science, no doubt, but that does not exclude her from being told she made a mistake with that kind of results. I hope she has a tangible explanation for it. She might make mention of her short quizzes, but she said,
the quizzes were just to take attendance
so that is canceled. An interim assessment was taken, i suppose she used it and that couldn't have yielded such a disgusting result. I just hope she never make such mistakes again for she is only driving students away from the nutrition department. To me i suggest she should re-mark the entire papers of the whole class because i think the results pasted is a sham, totally false. I wish all her students well this semester and I hope they do well this semester. She said she is going to be interactive this semester, i will advice, prepare for more bombing.
IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT ANY LECTURE, JUST DROP ME A MAIL AND I WILL DO THE HONOURS.
doom00791@gmail.com
